Search

We found 114 results matching for methods
Global guidance for life cycle impact assessment indicators and methods: on track
One of the downsides of LCA is that LCA results are difficult to interpret for those sustainability practitioners who aren’t specialised in LCA, but do rely on it on the battlefield. That’s why the LCA community has been striving so hard to find consensus and decide on standardisation, aiming to make LCA more efficient and easier to interpret. An important initiative is the Flagship 1b project of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, which aims to build global consensus and guidance. This article shows the exciting progress so far.

LCA of frozen food products versus their alternatives
When it comes to the carbon footprint of food products, the preservation method may end up mattering a lot. Keeping food frozen takes electricity. Fresh foods are more perishable. And jarred and canned foods have their own costs and benefits associated with them. But how do we know which method has the lowest carbon footprint for which type of food? For a large frozen food company, PRé compared 22 frozen food products with the same food product preserved with an alternative method.

Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment
Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) is a field of active development. The last decade has seen prolific publication of new impact assessment methods covering many different impact categories and providing characterization factors that often deviate from each other for the same substance and impact. Here you can read the journey towards identifying the best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment.